Talk:International Rules Series

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 24.239.128.12 in topic surgery picture of link preview for Subiaco Oval

Fair use rationale for Image:Irules.jpg edit

 

Image:Irules.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

flag icons edit

Shouldn't the Irish flag icon be the 4 province flag rather than the RoI flag? LunarLander // talk // 16:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:International Rules Logo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:International Rules Logo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 16 March 2015 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. EdJohnston (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


{{requested move/dated}}

– And all the rest of them. These pages were moved without discussion last September. The GAA and AFL both refer to the "International Rules Series". It is the title of the competition. The sport is international rules football; the competition is the International Rules Series. The current naming is like having, for example: "The football association challenge cup, known worldwide as the fa cup, is an annual knockout cup competition in English football". 86.45.164.69 (talk) 21:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Support this is not about generic international rules, this is about International Rules. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 05:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support - It's a proper noun, it should be capitalized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WildWikiGuy (talkcontribs) 20:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, it's the name of the series. Possibly the person that changed it wasn't familiar with the topic, but obviously a mistake on this one. Randy Kryn 15:48 18 March, 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
FYI This unsigned comment was contributed by 58.96.124.10 (not me). МандичкаYO 😜 23:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is weird - why weren't all of these moved? I didn't contribute to this discussion or these articles, but saw them here: Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests as not being moved despite unanimous consensus to move them, with no explanation of who decided that. So now you have two inconsistent articles like this: 2009 international rules series and 2013 International Rules Series. МандичкаYO 😜 23:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind, looks like they got moved after all. Not sure why someone tagged it as not done. МандичкаYO 😜 23:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, a bit of context for this move: in August last year User:Dicklyon quite randomly and without warning changed the title of this page and its subsidiaries to mostly all Lower case, on the basis that some sources didn't always capitalise the event. Must say I expressed my disagreement to him over the move on his talk page though considering he has a far greater degree of knowledge and is a more experienced wikipedian, I deferred to his judgment. I think the 'fa cup' example is a good one, I've never seriously thought that semantics might make it possible for the title of that event or others (say the World Cup) to be in lower case on Wikipedia. Anyway hope that clears any confusion up. Jono52795 (talk) 13:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

2013 series edit

Just a quick question (I'm from NSW so I really don't know much about this at all) on the 2013 games. Since it was a team restricted to Indigenous Australians (and named as such) should these games really count as part of the overall series (i.e. Australia v Ireland games) or separately? What was the feeling at the time - that they were different from the regular games or standard games albeit with a weakened Australian team? Tigerman2005 (talk) 01:24, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International Rules Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Rules Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International Rules Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Rules Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

surgery picture of link preview for Subiaco Oval edit

When hovering over link for Subiaco Oval (International Rules Series#Venues) a surgery picture is displayed. I would fix it if I knew how and had access. 24.239.128.12 (talk) 02:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply