Talk:Internal Revenue Code section 183

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tone banner edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed the tone banner after editing some of the sentences of the article.EECavazos (talk) 02:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Internal Revenue Code section 183/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== Class ==

Start class because this article needs sections on history and impact. Furthermore, some more references are needed.EECavazos (talk) 02:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

== Priority ==

The hobby loss rule is pretty important to the nature of income and loss in the grand scheme of things so with an expansion in such sections as history and impact I can see this article's priority going to "mid". Until then this is more a low priority because it doesn't quite state is claim to a higher priority and it so far limits itself to just the US. The concept behind it though is quite essential to the concept of deductions and loss.EECavazos (talk) 02:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 02:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 19:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic