Talk:Interferometry

GA candidate.svg

Interferometry is currently a good article nominee. Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article, as outlined on the nominations page.

Reviewers: To start the review process, follow this link to create a dedicated subpage for the review. (If you have already done this, and the template has not changed, try purging this talk page.)

Nominated by Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) at 21:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Physics (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon
Portal icon Physics portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Archives

Pre-2012 talk discussion

Advice on re-organization

{{helpme}} Like others on this talk page, I found this article to be surprisingly lame considering the importance of the subject matter. The original article was written by people who were mainly interested in astronomical interferometry, and other applications of interferometry were sort of neglected. Most of the edits over the last few years have been timid additions and corrections compared with what the article really needed in terms of a rewrite. So I decided to try my hand at reorganization.

What I need is another set of eyeballs critiquing what I've done so far. Am I headed on the right path, or no? And what in tarnation should I do with the awful Interferometry#Imaging interferometry section? I shoved it to the rear, but should I really be splitting it out to its own separate article? Or should I merge it into Astronomical interferometer and let those guys deal with the mess? (not a very nice thing to do ...) Maybe I should just (shudder) delete it?

Also, I removed the "radio-astronomy" template at the bottom. This contributed to the article imbalance. Agree?

Thanks for the extra eyes, Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 18:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Splitsection.svg Text from Optical interferometry was copied into Interferometry with [486275711 this edit]. Optical interferometry now serves to provide attribution for that content in Interferometry and must not be deleted so long as Interferometry exists. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see this history; for its talk page, see Talk:Optical interferometry.