Talk:Insteon (company)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2023. The result of the discussion was merge. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Scope creep (talk · contribs) on 6 January 2023. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Insteon (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100217034754/http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/home_improvement/4301977.html to http://www.popularmechanics.com/home_journal/home_improvement/4301977.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Emphasis and Bias edit
This article, as it stands (dec 2022) appears, to me, to be more interested in pointing out the shutdown/restart of the company as opposed to what it is, does, and future plans/directions. The reader is left with a negative feeling about the company even though it has great technology and product. Yes, some place in the "history" it is valid to talk about the 2022 "pothole"; absolutely. Many companies have stumbled along the way; but it shouldn't be the sole point. I would take a shot at refocusing this article but have little success in editing Wikipedia articles. So, this talking point is just a signpost along the way. 152.117.115.186 (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)