Talk:Inri Cristo

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2804:7F2:8280:24DB:259A:CA76:9C50:E597 in topic Sources that can be used for Alvaro's article

Statements needing clarification edit

In copyediting this article I removed two statements that I didn't quite understand. One refers to the period in which Thais was speaking on radio (between 1969 and 1971): "Although an atheist, he lived as a prophet of a God he did not know." If he was an actual atheist at the time, he cannot have believed he was the prophet of a god; therefore, I suspect that this statement is from the perspective of Thais' current messianic beliefs. A statement in the article about what Thais believed he was doing at that time would be welcome, but someone needs to figure out what he believed first.

Answer: there is a clash of statements because the uknown "God" was the powerfull voice inside of his head since childwood (Since childhood, Inri has claimed to obey a "powerful voice" that speaks inside his head.) The CREATOR GOD was only revealed after the fast in Santiago do Chile.

The second statement came after the description of his break-in at the church in Belém and subsequent imprisonment: "Such act would have meant the rupture of the bi-millenarian bond with the Roman Catholic Church." Again, this sounds like it's written from the perspective of a believer in Thais' messianic claims. "Such act" apparently means the accusations of vandalism by the church, and I can't see that "bi-millennarian bond" means anything other than the relationship of the church with its messiah. Claiming that the church rejected its messiah by accusing Thais of a crime is not adopting a neutral point of view. If Thais stated that the church had done that, and if that incident was the prompt for Thais to form SOUST as an alternative church, that would be worth noting, but it would have to be stated that way. A. Parrot (talk) 03:01, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Answer: - just starting on inquisition and world governance by fear and power, etc....some positive points but the negatives are to many too list, Christ spirit have been out of earth for around 2000 years, it looks clear that as soon he came back and seen what they did in his "name" offcourse that would come to happen a rupture.

T.Teixeira (not religious not a believer)

Sources that can be used for Alvaro's article edit