Talk:Inkspell
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Inkspell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lwriter18.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Characters edit
I haven't read the book (I'm researching a purchase), but there seem to be a lot of spoilers in this section. I'm adding a 'spoiler warning' but smeone needs to fix the section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.130.135.119 (talk) 13:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC).
Plot Summary issue edit
There seems to be misuse of the words "fatal wound" in the description of the wound sustained by the character "Mo". If the wound is a fatal wound, it results in death... Always results in death. If the contributor meant as very serious injury which may result in death. The proper words are "mortal wound". Which is defined as an injury which may result in death. Seattlefungus (talk) 20:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Spoiler edit
Just so people know, I've added a spoiler warning. Brianna 22:46, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles should not have spoilers. See WP:SPOILERS and WP:NODISCLAIMERS. If you don't want to read the spoilers, don't read the obvious-in-purpose Plot summary section. Eugeniu B +1 01:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
No, in general Wikipedia is spoiler-agnostic. Spoiler warnings are not appropriate for Wikipedia; Wikipedia's articles are inherently spoilery where appropriate and this will never be changed or softened. Call it the house style, if you will. 70.100.83.118 (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
why is being Merged to C Funke? edit
I think w should merge this, along with the other books in this seris, into Inkheart Triology bcause I think Its just too much to merg it into C Funke. PS sorry for th bad spelling th keyboard has a bit of problem 76.124.224.179 (talk) 01:36, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Inkspell/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| This needs a bit of work: please edit. I've done a bit of work on it, but some of the basic spelling and grammar needs checking. |
Last edited at 16:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 18:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Edits to Inkspell edit
Hey there editors, I am part of a university course that is doing edits on Wikipedia for an assignment. I chose this article because I have read the book and saw that it needs plot summary revision and some added citations. This is all I plan to help improve thus far on the article.
To revise the plot, I will be doing some sentence reconstruction to make the summary more concise as per requested. Lwriter18 (talk) 16:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)