Talk:Infinite canvas
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Infinite canvas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This page has been cited as a source by a notable professional or academic publication: Bell, Mark The Review Of Communication Vol. 6, nos 1-2, January-April 2006, pp. 131-140. Ball State University. |
Untitled edit
so how about a link to the software? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.251.84.226 (talk • contribs) 11:28, 2005 July 18.
Serialization edit
I do think that infinite canvas causes a certain obstacle to serialization, because serialization, especially at a daily or weekly level is inherently discrete in terms of being divided into bits that can be produced in that timespan. --Random832(tc) 00:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- It can be an obstacle, sure, but it isn't necessarily. Infinite canvas only means that the artist can use whatever "page size" they want regardless of physical limitations (although there are still of course technical limitations regarding production and scrolling to read). One of the best-known examples of infinite canvas is Demian5's "When I Am King", which was serialized. An artist can also build on a single page in installments. — Gwalla | Talk 03:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
computer screens being much "cleaner" than newsprint edit
Why is that tagged as "original research?". It is due to similar DPI (often higher for a screen) and the digital nature of the screen, where the white is always white, no matter what's next to int. In print, dots does not have sharp borders, so you can't have perfect white dot just between black ones. That are quite widely known facts, don't you all agree? <irony>Provide me source for claim that at day sky is usually blue, would you?</irony> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.164.157.81 (talk) 4 June 2009
- The tag is not just for the fact of how computer screens are, but also for the claim that this affects comics (and makes comics "better" on computer screens). In other words, the original research is the connection between these ideas, not just the one idea itself. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 17:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
RSS Wii cite edit
The article linked to appears to no longer exist; suggest removal and replacement with a newer suitable cite. 24.113.36.43 (talk) 21:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)