Talk:Indianapolis (balance)

Not making sense

How are none of the listed towns included? The paragraph after the list makes no sense, especially with Indianapolis in that list itself. --Eric 00:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I think it means that "the balance" is pre-consolidation Indianapolis plus pre-consolidated unincorporated area. The list I think is a list of all the officially-existing municipalities that are in the county consolidation; the Census measures Indianapolis as a whole, but it also measures the other consolidated municipalities (such as Rocky Ripple), and therefore it's only fair to measure the area that is in neither the excluded municipalities nor the non-original-Indianapolis included ones. Nyttend 20:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move per request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

---

Indianapolis (balance), Indiana → Indianapolis (balance) – The city article is at Indianapolis. There is no good reason to use a convoluted and contrived name for this article. older ≠ wiser 20:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

• Comment but it isn't a type of balance to be disambiguated from Indianapolis, it is an undisambiguated term that needs clarification from standard Wikipedia practice of disambiguation using parenthetical forms... 70.49.124.225 (talk) 03:41, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

• I'm not sure I understand your point. The article is about an abstract statistical entity consisting of a portion of the city of Indianapolis. If per wikipedia conventions "Indiana" is unnecessary for to disambiguate the city of Indianapolis proper, why is it necessary for this subportion? We do not append Indiana to neighborhoods in the city. older ≠ wiser 12:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

• I mean that "Indianapolis (balance)" looks like "Indianapolis" with a disambiguator "balance", instead of "Indianapolis (balance)" as a single term. As you mention, portions of cities usually use the city as the qualifier, so this should probably be called Indianapolis (balance), Indianapolis. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 03:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

• I still don't understand why Indianapolis (balance), Indianapolis would be any better. "(balance)" is a disambiguator of a sort. I don't see why it needs to be more complicated than that. older ≠ wiser 23:55, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

• Comment. In the Census Bureau data tables, the subject is given as either Indianapolis city (balance) or as Indianapolis (city (balance)), Indiana. These two forms seem to be about equally official, and the first one certainly fits our style better. Kauffner (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
• Support. We don't need the more complicated form when the simpler one serves the purpose just as well or better.--Cúchullain ^t/c 17:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indianapolis (balance). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indianapolis (balance). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090903221702/http://www.census.gov/popest/geographic/ to http://www.census.gov/popest/geographic/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)