Talk:Indian Ordnance Factories Service

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian Ordnance Factories Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

If there is an edit war going on, I will seek protection! edit

So knock it off and use the talk page before fighting, IP and Matt.L3X1 (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2017 (UTC)the vandal copReply

Article fully locked edit

Hi - I have fully locked the article due to the edit warring/content dispute going on. Please discuss the changes you would like made below, and request edits using the {{Edit fully-protected}} template -- Samtar talk · contribs 15:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External link cleanup edit

I'm trying to cleanup the massively long external link section. As it's been reverted, time to discuss. First issue, there are multiple links to the same official site. See WP:ELMINOFFICCIAL. Second issue, multiple You-Tube videos that should either be used as references in the article (if they meet WP:RS criterial or flat removed. Finally, just links that are barely related. A cleanup is absolutely needed here. Ravensfire (talk) 16:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

You cannot write a single, coherent statement and I'm unable to comprehend what you are trying to say. And I know this is your new account among several others. There is no point in talking to you and I think I should involve some admin in this discussion else it will be another futile attempt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.155.84 (talk) 16:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Really. Please do get an admin involved then. Your claims are so patently false as to push the bounds of credibility. A refusal to discuss is evidence of edit-warring. I've already asked for help in one place, if you want to get an admin involved, go to WP:AN or PW:ANI. Please repeat your personal attacks there so they can be handled as they deserve. Ravensfire (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Sure, let's see what the admins have to say about this. Allow me to involve some checkuser too, I'll let them know about your Japanmomo and other accounts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.155.84 (talk) 17:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Go for it. Watch out for the WP:BOOMERANG though. Ravensfire (talk) 17:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
oh sure, don't you worry! we all know what happened in the past every single time!
Unless this one time, you might be wrong. You haven't looked too closely at the age of my account or my editing history, have you? Please take a few moments. If you still want to, get the admins involved so you can realize you are wrong about this and actually start discussing how to improve this article. Ravensfire (talk) 17:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
I know you've been around for quite some time with multiple socks. The CU digs much deeper and wider than that. The article is neutral and well-cited. The links are official and none of them promotes the subject of the article.

NPOV tag edit

I added the NPOV tag because several of the sources mentioned a scandal. Zero mention is made in the article of any scandal. At a short glance, something seems to be warranted, so not having a mention is a NPOV issue. If a person is notable because of some malfeasance on their part, they need to be included. This isn't a pure puff-piece, it's an encyclopedia article. Ravensfire (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Indian Ordnance Factories Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply