Talk:Independent business

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Seagull123 in topic Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2016

AQA controversy edit

Don't think the AQA controversy is related at all. Especially as the section is opinionated and has zero sources. If you keep the section, maybe have a more neutral stance and views from both sides? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.217.142 (talk) 12:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

@109.149.217.142: Yep, I agree with you. I don't think it's notable enough to be included on this Wikipedia page, possibly (only possibly), on the AQA GCSE page (if there is one). I know that there are news articles about it (like the one in the {{press}} template above) but I don't think even these warrant its inclusion.  Seagull123  Φ  17:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

I've just removed the GCSE bit from the article for the reasons given above. If you disagree, please discuss here/revert.  Seagull123  Φ  22:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2016 edit

NOT A BIOLOGY QUESTION — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.56.66 (talk) 17:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Not done @88.109.56.66: If you would like to request a change to be made, please do it in the format of "please change XXXX to YYYY". Have a look at the {{Edit semi-protected}} template for more information. Thanks!  Seagull123  Φ  20:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply