Talk:Impeachment of Warren Hastings
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled] edit
Seriously biased article on an important subject.Shtove (talk) 00:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress edit
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Impeachment and acquittal of Andrew Johnson which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
One-sided, simplistic history edit
This article ends by throwing it's hands up, as to why Hastings was impeached in the first place. That in itself shows how derelict it is. It quotes staunch supporters of Hastings as if they lack any interest in his acquittal, despite their service in the East India Company. Burke's complex arguments are ignored. The treatment of Indians is treated as a "he said, she said" issue, when facts exist. In fact, it's a disgrace to Indians, with it's tacit approval of the means necessary to establish British rule. A bad article that should be rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.80.117.214 (talk) 07:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Absolutism edit
Did Warren Hastings practice absolutism? 2601:47:4084:C9F0:D4D1:BFA9:AB42:ED68 (talk) 02:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)