Talk:Impaired glucose tolerance

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merger Discussion

The

edit

The page title includes a typo - it reads "imparied" not "impaired". I don't know how to edit that, the normal edit box does not show the title.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.127.155 (talkcontribs) 23:26, 8 January 2007
OK will move.David Ruben Talk 04:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Stevia

edit

A herb said to improve glucose tolerance. It can't be mentioned here because this article is for the impaired glucose condition. So please see Sugar Substitute. 117.221.180.17 (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)HappyReply

Merger Discussion

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To merge Subclinical diabetes and Impaired glucose tolerance into Prediabetes. Klbrain (talk) 16:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Request received to merge articles: Subclinical diabetes into Impaired glucose tolerance; dated: January/2018.

Proposer's Rationale: Subclinical diabetes appears to be the same thing as impaired glucose tolerance, see here and here. The term subclinical diabetes appears to be still used - e.g. [1], [2], but if they are referring to the same thing, then they should be merged. I would however leave this to people who may know more to decide if they are indeed the same and if it should be merged. Discuss here. Hzh (talk) 22:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment. Isn't this a form of Prediabetes? If so, both articles should be merged into the parent. – S. Rich (talk) 07:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
The article appears to claim that it precedes prediabetes. At the moment there are a number of articles that seem to be saying similar things, for example Impaired glucose tolerance, Impaired fasting glucose, Prediabetes, and this Subclinical diabetes. There seems to be a few new papers on subclinical diabetes, perhaps the experts have changed the definition. Whether they stay as separate articles or merged, the subject needs someone with a better or up-to-date understanding to clear all this up, otherwise it gets very confusing. Hzh (talk) 11:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.