Talk:Immutable characteristic

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Correctable" edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I would like to remove the word "correctable", as this uncharitably restricts the point of view to which it is being ascribed. Speaking for myself, I view sexual orientation (more precisely, sexual activity which conforms to a presumptive sexual orientation) as a behavior, but I would not necessarily characterize it as "correctable". Obviously, there's a lot to argue about here, which is not my intention. But "correctable" there diminishes a point of view unnecessarily, which may not be the most NPOV representation. Haakondahl (talk) 11:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Delete this article edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It has no sources. Just a couple of links to other WP article, none of which substantiate what is said here. Several of the protected groups are not immutable. Being a hate crime has little to do with anything being immutable. I say delete the article as worthless. Roger (talk) 03:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Toussaint and Roscelese are both known LGBT types. This stupid article should be deleted immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.77.22.9 (talk) 12:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Physical edit

If immutable characteristics are, as per the definition provided in this article, limited only to physical attributes, then how can there be any debate over whether sexual orientation is covered?

Add topic