Talk:Icewind Dale (series)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 8 February 2018

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Icewind Dale (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 8 February 2018 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move to the requested title, per the discussion below. Until such time as consensus changes, the hatnote in place should help any readers who might be inconvenienced by this. Dekimasuよ! 20:31, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


Icewind Dale (series)Icewind Dale (video game series) – "(series)" by itself remains ambiguous because of the The Icewind Dale Trilogy book series upon which the video games are based. After move, also suggest that the leftover redirect point to the trilogy as WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT the most expected destination per WP:R#ASTONISH. Netoholic @ 19:31, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose - Unless the book series was literally at Icewind Dale (book series) - which its not, nor should it be - its makes the "video game" disambiguation unnecessary. We disambiguate per article titles, not just existence of media in general. Sergecross73 msg me 19:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Searching for "Icewind Dale series" I am primarily given results which discuss the more famous book series. That's why I suggested repointing the redirect. Redirects are also article titles which we have to work around for purposes of disambiguation. Either the video games or book series could be a viable target for Icewind Dale (series), which is why the video game article needs more complete disambiguation. -- Netoholic @ 19:55, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
For full transparency, Icewind Dale (book series) was a red link when I made the comment below, and made minutes ago by the discussion starter, so we're not talking about some long-running redirect that has helped readers in the past, but rather, something just created to advance their argument here. That aside, I don't think your average Wikipedia is going to type in something like that into a search bar regardless. Sergecross73 msg me 20:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
If I type in the search box "Icewind Dale", the autosuggest puts Icewind Dale (series) up before the Trilogy. People clicking that might be searching for the games, but most likely the books due to the popularity. That's what I mean when I cite WP:ASTONISH so that we can better serve readers. Filling in that redlink is to serve that same purpose. Per WP:INCDAB, if there are two series related to Icewind Dale, we should make sure both are clearly disambiguated. And per WP:R#ASTONISH, that the redirects are targetted toward the most likely destination. -- Netoholic @ 20:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose Per Sergecross, disambiguations are meant for articles that share the same name, not for partial title matches. Per WP:SMALLDETAILS any confusion between books and games can easily be resolved by a hatnote.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support Sergecross in good faith is incorrect, disambiguation policy/guidelines are not meant for articles that share the same name, but is a product of both title and real world issues. In this case a real world issue is involved. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:20, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per there not being an article that this conflicts with. The Icewind Dale Trilogy is already a WP:NATURALDIS. DABs are not about potential ambiguity. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 12:25, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Current title is ambiguous and could refer to the book series. --woodensuperman 12:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.