Talk:Ian T. Baldwin

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2A02:A44E:2D7B:1:D871:A8AC:72FC:F58D in topic Using the title of Dr?

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ian T. Baldwin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Using the title of Dr? edit

I looked up this scientist after chatting with German colleagues about the usage of the title "Doctor" in Germany. I vaguely recalled the story and internet provided the details missing in my memory. I did not add a section in his bio, because I cannot decide what would be best: from one hand side, Baldwin's scientific focus and achievements should surely be the main point of his bio. From the other hand side, me, a scientist from another area, only heard of him in connection to being cautioned by German authorities, and thus he is in my view famous for being made an example pointing out a weird German law. Thus, seeing that not even a single sentence has been spent on this in the main summary felt like a deliberate and perhaps unfortunate omission. In a sense, the bio is too "sanitised" and thus in my view not neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A44E:2D7B:1:D871:A8AC:72FC:F58D (talk) 12:08, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply