Talk:I am lonely will anyone speak to me
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 August 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I am lonely will anyone speak to me article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Notability edit
The thread was lengthily covered by 3 highly notable magazines and had very high popularity on the internet, this is why I have made the article based on the astonishing famous thread instead of the forum itself, which is not notable. And I may add some redirects so people who are searching for this thread can find it easier, such as if they type in, "The I am lonely thread" or "Lonely thread". I just wanted to make sure that was clear, thank you.NexCarnifex (talk) 20:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Being lengthly covered by 3 highly notable magazines isn't enough notability for such an small article for an shockingly popular thread, the internet's most popular place to talk about loneliness? I've come across many articles that are much less notable than this famous thread. NexCarnifex (talk) 20:49, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, the sources clearly indicate notability. I have removed the tag. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 21:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Take Five Forums is non-notable edit
Whoever it is, stop adding Take Five Forums or subsequent replacement links for the thread on Wikipedia. These sites or web pages are not notable by the standards of today. The original Moviecodec thread "I am lonely will anyone speak to me" was notable for its time, but that does not mean its replacements are the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.130.172.246 (talk) 01:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)