Information edit

The information there is correct. I just don't know how to refrence sources

Keep this article edit

it was a top ten song and as such, deserves to stay! 172.148.114.145 12:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I Want a New Drug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I removed the following. edit

I removed the following under the lawsuit section. “With the fact that the "Ghostbusters" single topped the Billboard charts, the argument could be made that Parker's piracy made the song Lewis's first #1 single, but it wound up being Parker's last song to even reach the Top Ten.”

The is no source or citation for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paige Matheson (talkcontribs) 22:23, 7 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed (is it?) on description of the ending of the single-version edit

I did a quick cleanup to correct some incorrect musical terminology where the description of single-version of the song holds on a chord and fades out. I noticed a "needs citation" note there, but I'm wondering what is needed. The single-version itself is the citation, because one can listen to it happen. Is the outstanding question whether or not this is the single-version? Is it merely in the wrong place and meant to ask about the multiple edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guyne (talkcontribs) 17:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply