Talk:I.O.N (manga)

Article Name

Why is the article named I-O-N, when Viz released it as I.O.N? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:11, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Good question. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Poking about googlespace, I can see no reason why not to move the article to the official English title I.O.N, with redirects from common mispunctuations such as I.O.N. and I-O-N and I·O·N (that last being the Japanese version). —Quasirandom (talk) 19:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Done :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

reviews

I know someone had mentioned that they couldn't find any reviews, but I found two. I'm pretty sure the ANN one would be fine for inclusion, but I'm not sure about the other one.

• Comic Book Bin Review
• Anime News Network Review --Kelakagandy (talk) 21:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, Comic Book Bin is a reliable source -- the seem to do at least some fact-checking on their news reports, but I don't know of a specific ruling/investigation about it from either WT:RS or WP:COMICS. Since the site's focus is American comics, possibly someone over in WT:COMICS would be able to comment on their reputation. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

FWIW, Comic Book Bin has been used as a reference in 23 articles, including Shonen Jump (magazine). —Quasirandom (talk) 21:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)