Talk:Hypuronector

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Refs? edit

The same reference is separately created twice. Is this the intention? Lythronaxargestes (talk) 00:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, in every case where everything is the same, or one ref to the same paper is more completely filled out, just replace the other, it saves time and can be reverted easily if there is evidence they should stay separated. Quite often people just don't know how to properly add multiple footnotes to the same ref, I know I didn't when I first joined. IJReid discuss 03:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hypuronector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply