Talk:Hurricane Flossy (1956)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 21 February 2018
Good articleHurricane Flossy (1956) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHurricane Flossy (1956) is part of the 1956 Atlantic hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 28, 2008Good article nomineeListed
February 6, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 6, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Hurricane Flossy was the first tropical cyclone to significantly impact oil refining in the Gulf of Mexico?
Current status: Good article

Todo edit

More storm history. →Cyclone1 00:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

If the article is not progressing fast enough for your liking, you can help out. Thegreatdr 03:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Flossy or Flossie edit

Which one is it? The article uses both. 207.203.80.14 14:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's Flossy. Man, why does this article have both!? RaNdOm26 16:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Because when a request was put in for this article, it was spelled with an ie at the end (tropical cyclone project mistake). I found out a little later it ended with a y...I should have checked to make sure as I began the article. Thought I'd changed it all over to the y form. If I missed some occurrences, I'm glad you made the change. Thegreatdr 02:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deaths edit

Why is there no mention of the 16 fatalities in the Impact section? And the main article says 15 fatalities, which is it? -- §HurricaneERIC§ archive 15:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    The lead could be expanded with a little more information.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

This is very close to GA, but the only problem is the lead. It should be expanded to include the date it formed, the date it became a storm, depression, its peak strength, and weakening. Also, put a few tidbits of damage in. When that is fixed, it will pass. Until then, I've put the article on-hold. Thank you for your work in improving the article thus far, and good luck in improving it to GA status. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 02:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done, I think. I've also added a couple links to a new See Also section, which are relevant. Thegreatdr (talk) 06:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    The lead could be expanded with a little more information.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Ok, now that the lead was expanded with more information, the article meets all criteria. Thus, it passes GA. Thank you for your hard work in improving this article to GA status. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 13:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 8 February 2017 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Request opened by block-evader. NeilN talk to me 18:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


Hurricane Flossy (1956)Hurricane Flossy – Only one Atlantic hurricane named Flossy. 219.79.250.146 (talk) 01:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. SkyWarrior 02:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Flossy (1956). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hurricane Flossy (1956). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 February 2018 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 02:47, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply



Hurricane Flossy (1956)Hurricane Flossy – Only one Atlantic hurricane named Flossy. B dash (talk) 02:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose cannot see the advantage of removing the year for events. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support Unnecessary disambiguation. Wrongly implying there is another hurricane with this name, as the current title does, is NOT helpful to anyone. --В²C 02:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - Hurricane Flossy should redirect to Tropical Storm Flossie, where there are multiple similar names that were used for tropical cyclones.Nova Crystallis (Talk) 01:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.