Talk:Humbug (sweet)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Poor references edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The first two references - - "The Oxford companion to food" and "The Glutton's Glossary" - - point to "Google Books" which only show details about the books, themselves; nothing about "Humbugs." As such, they are useless. However, I am reluctant to remove them without something to replace them. Skaizun (talk) 04:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Etymology edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article claims that the name has no connection with the use of "humbug" to mean "sham" or hoax, etc. (as in "Bah, humbug!"). No evidence is offered, and it frankly seems highly unlikely that there's no connection at all. As the etymology of the term is unknown, it's hard to see what basis there could be for the claim that there's no connection; the O.E.D. includes both uses under the same head. --87.114.176.43 (talk) 14:03, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The claim that the name of the sweet is unrelated to the Humbug that denotes falsity is uncited. Further, no other explanation is offered for the name of the sweet. It's 30 months since you posted to the talk page, so I'm going to delete the uncited claim.

MrDemeanour (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

And I deleted the whole paragraph. It's all uncited.

I think I see why the claim is there; it's because someone wants to talk about popular culture references to humbugs at Christmas. They're disavowing any suggestion that Scrooge was referring to sweets, by asserting the opposite.

Well, the lede is for summarising content from the body. None of that stuff appears in the body. The pop cultural references should go in their own section.

15:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Add topic