Talk:Hubert Pierlot/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 18:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   No copyvios detected.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

   Didn't find any problems with the prose.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   MOS followed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   Citation and reference sections are detailed and well-formatted.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

   B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:

   Adequate citations to reliable sources. I cannot access the sources right now, so I'm accepting them AGF.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

   C. No original research:

   All content and analysis is verifiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Stays focused on major aspects.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

   Remains focused on the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Fair, neutral presentation, all analysis is attributed to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   No edit warring or other disruptions since this article was created in 2006.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   All images are licensed for public domain or under Creative Commons.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   Images are highly informative, with appropriate captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

7. Overall: A very good article, should be ready for the FAC process.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

   Pass or Fail: