Talk:Horrible Bosses/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: —Mike Allen 02:27, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

What makes File:Horrible bosses bluray.jpg special enough to be included?

b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

2. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Since the Music section is so well-developed, would it work better under the production section? Not a requirement at all, but you know about archiving sources. If you plan to take this to FA, that will be useful.

Comment I was using the blu-ray cover pretty much like an Album cover, it's not a huge deal but I can't really justify it beyond that so I have removed it. I moved the music section into the production area. I will archive everything either today or tomorrow, just been having some issues with my right hand and since I'm right handed, makes using the mouse a nuisance. Though I think I'll have to page-reference the production notes before taking it for FA. Thanks for taking the time to do this btw.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 10:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Woo! Thanks Mike. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)