Talk:Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC v. Salazar
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
NPOV edit
My goodness, this article consists entirely of a bogus attack on Judge Feldman, and no discussion of the underlying case or law, or the administration's violation of the APA. THF (talk) 21:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. Wasn't sure if the bits on recusal and the judges holdings could be modified to maintain neutrality without causing a stir.--Arundodonax (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Definitely a bad article in its current form and I wrote much of it. The actual case isn't discussed much at all. The Feldman Controversy was being covered at the bio page, but I'd argue its best handled here where it could, eventually, be contextualized. The feldman controversy should just be one portion of a much larger article on the entirety of the case, right now it's still the only part of the article discussed. add away :) --Alecmconroy (talk) 01:20, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
This article is primarily mainly a hit piece on Judge Feldman by someone who doesn't like the fact that he ruled against the administration. It has little discussion of the case, and consists primarily of repeating partisan allegations of conflicts of interest. It's a travesty, and should be substantially improved or taken down. —Preceding unsigned comment added by King Alexander (talk • contribs) 07:55, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
I tried to sign my remarks here. I typed "74.193.164.151 (talk) 02:37, 9 July 2010 (UTC)" but evidently that did not do the trick. From now on in this section I will type out my name. s/King Alexander
out of date edit
The substance of this article hasn't been edited in 2-1/2 years! Where does the case stand now? ... I found these:
- http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-5th-circuit/1616547.html
- http://environmentalappealscourt.blogspot.de/2012/11/hornbeck-offshore-services-et-al-v.html
Art Carlson (talk) 08:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC v. Salazar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100704222019/http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/GENERAL/Notices/10-1663_doc67.pdf to http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/GENERAL/Notices/10-1663_doc67.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100704222019/http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/GENERAL/Notices/10-1663_doc67.pdf to http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/GENERAL/Notices/10-1663_doc67.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC v. Salazar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029171127/http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/feldman.pdf to http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/feldman.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716081454/http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/GENERAL/Notices/10-1663_doc82.pdf to http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/GENERAL/Notices/10-1663_doc82.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608065852/http://www.judicialwatch.org/jfd/Feldman_Martin_L_C/2008.pdf to http://www.judicialwatch.org/jfd/Feldman_Martin_L_C/2008.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029171127/http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/feldman.pdf to http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/feldman.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)