Talk:Homogeneity (physics)
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
A valid equation in physics must be homogeneous. edit
ms^-1 = m / s (converted to base units) ms^-1 = ms^-1 (rearranged) The LHS of the equation = the RHS. Thus, it is homogeneous.
However, if the equation is homogeneous, it doesn't necessarily mean the equation will be true. eg Volume of a sphere = (pi)r^3 This equation is homogenous, but we know that it isn't true, as it is missing the 4/3 before the (pi). I doubt if an equation being dimensionally consistent or not has anything to do with homogenity. Please confirm
Merging with "Invariant (physics)" edit
Merging this article with "Invariant (physics)" has been proposed. I think there is some potential for a full article on the general subject. But I would hope to also keep this page, to simply define the word for quick reference from physics topics that use it. I intend to reference it for that purpose in upcoming writings. -- Chris Mid 20:41, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Wikipedia isn't for defining words, that's wiktionary- wikt:homogeneity. Bhny (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
big cleanup edit
I just made a big cleanup.
I think the article is now readable and useful, yet still a stub. Both issues need to be developed (in separate sections). But I think the { { merge...}} tag could be removed now. — MFH:Talk 15:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Confusing edit
this article is unreadable to a lay person such as my self. When giving examples to try and explain a concept it is better to give examples simpler then the thing trying to be explained, IMHO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.120.227.160 (talk • contribs)
Opposite Definition edit
Heterogeneous is the opposite of homogeneous and should be included. Hlunnb (talk) 00:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Intro edit
The introductory paragraph of this article does not seem to bear any relationship whatsoever to the rest of the contents. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC).
- I have to agree that the intro does not seem to express homogeneous or Homogeneity in physics. I am going to give it a shot. But my knowledge is only about materials that are effectively homogeneous. Steve Quinn (formerly Ti-30X) (talk) 04:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
What is the point of this article? edit
It seems to be more about the word rather than a topic. I added a "Dictionary" hatnote. Is there some topic we could salvage?