Talk:Homeworld/GA1

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Cognissonance in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cognissonance (talk · contribs) 23:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Looks good. But is it? Find out on the next episode of Homeworld Ball Z. Cognissonance (talk) 23:29, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lead edit

  • "The music of the game was composed by composer" — Minimize repetition: "The music was written by composer".
  • "which became considered the defining theme of the game" — Improve prose: "considered the defining theme of the game".
  • "which was also highly reviewed" — Minimize repetition: "which was also critically panned".

Gameplay edit

  • "In multiplayer games, the objective is typically to destroy the enemy motherships, though other battle-oriented victory conditions are available" — Clarify: "In multiplayer games, the objective is typically to destroy the enemy motherships, though in Homeworld other battle-oriented victory conditions are available".

Plot edit

  • "along with a stone map marking Kharak along with another planet across the galaxy" — Minimize repetition: "along with a stone map marking Kharak with another planet across the galaxy".

Development edit

  • "In addition to the original music compositions for the game" — Simplify: "In addition to the original music compositions".
  • "for the scene in the game" — Minimize repetition: "on behalf of the scene in the game".
  • "digital album bundled with the" — Minimize repetition: "digital album with the".

Reception edit

  • "noting that it was so good" can be less informal with "noting that it was beneficial".
  • "Levine claimed it was "on par with the graphics" and praised how the sound" — Clarify: "Levine claimed it was "on par with the graphics", praising how the sound".

Remaster edit

  • "who confirmed in 2007 that they has acquired the rights to the series" — Fix grammar: "which confirmed in 2007 that it had acquired the rights to the series".

Overall edit

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Next episode of Homeworld Ball Z: Yes, it is good.
    Pass/Fail:  
    @PresN: Cognissonance (talk) 02:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply