Talk:Holt Manufacturing Company/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 09:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Minor prose issues which I have fixed, and article complies to MoS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All references appear to be in order.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Requirements in this area have been met.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Complies with WP:NPOV.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article appears to be stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Pictures comply with fair use requirements and captions are all in order.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Summary: There were a few minor prose issues, mainly to do with punctuation. As they were minor, I decided to fix these myself. A lot of work has gone into this article. I am satisfied that this article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it for GA status. Congratulations to all those involved.