Talk:Holographic associative memory
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Holographic associative memory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (September 2010) |
Untitled edit
This article is terribly written. The point of wikipedia is to make knowlege easily accessable to the general individual, and if its deliberately written in obscure terms, the article might as well be nonexistant. Fix this article and add explanitory graphics or im having it removed.DescentPro (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)DescentPro
I'd go farther: Not only is the article terribly written, but it could easily have been written by one of those random generators like the one used in the SCIgen project. In fact, that's my guess. 165.176.7.3 (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Does the technology mentioned actually exist?? The Acronym is somewhat suspicious. I've been dying to append the following to the article (but I'll put it here to avoid trouble).
"It has been designed to compliment Cognitive Hardware Esoteric Environment Simulation Electronics. Due to the size and complexity of prototypes, 2 breadboards are usually required. Recent development in low energy microcontrollers (known as PIC-LEs) have also improved appreciation for this technology." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.29.213 (talk) 13:18, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
- Indeed, this technology was first described more than 20 years ago. See this publication, for example. Jarble (talk) 19:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- People have described lots of things over the past 100 years that never existed, this being one of them. Just because it was published doesn't mean it needs a wikipedia page. Then again, at least this was an actual constructive idea instead of a random invented comic book character's entire story transcribed by a mentally retarded 10 year old boy into a list of things the character punched, and the latter is allowed on wikipedia, so this article is technically kinda high quality. --A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 04:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Although it's a bit hard to judge whether "another way of looking at this problem mathematically", which is what most of the references seem to be about, exists. --A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 04:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- People have described lots of things over the past 100 years that never existed, this being one of them. Just because it was published doesn't mean it needs a wikipedia page. Then again, at least this was an actual constructive idea instead of a random invented comic book character's entire story transcribed by a mentally retarded 10 year old boy into a list of things the character punched, and the latter is allowed on wikipedia, so this article is technically kinda high quality. --A Shortfall Of Gravitas (talk) 04:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)