This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
It should be made clear that this article is a summary of a work of fiction which appeared on the "History" Channel (more correctly the "Pseudo-History Channel"). It is not history.JohnC (talk) 06:42, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Could you please make additions as to what information given in the show was inaccurate. It is most definitely an important addition seeing that this show is being presented as an accurate historical documentary. ZgokE (talk) 15:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
much of what this show stated as "fact" is not fact, but conjecture..often times this conjecture goes aganst the preveling opinon of the historic academic community...and in few cases, such conjecture is just flad out emperically false....but i am not bothering to go into it any further.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.38.62 (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
.png){kind=small}
