Microcontroller? edit

Isn't it a microcontroller? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.81.137.4 (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

It depends on how it's used whether you could call it a microcontroller, but when this was produced it was considered and used as a CPU.--KJRehberg (talk) 17:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

A microcontroller has always been an I/O system on a chip: a microprocessor with RAM, at least one peripheral (timer, serial port etc) and with most of its pins available as programmable I/O (rather than dedicated to accessing memory). The HD64180 has no internal RAM or ROM and a large number of its pins can only be used for memory access. So I'd say it's definitely not a microcontroller. It's more like the 80186/80188 embedded microprocessors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.93.164.28 (talk) 11:31, 31 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

When was this processor released? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.86.17.25 (talk) 01:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply