Talk:History of watches

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Gareth Griffith-Jones in topic Date headings

Untitled edit

The article doesn't contain information about pilot watches, only watches in general, and very shallow at that.

I agree with the unsigned comment above, so I intend to move this article to Wrist watch. Biscuittin 10:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I tried, but got an error message. I think I might have to wait for the server to catch up. Biscuittin 10:55, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Moved to Wrist watch (history). Biscuittin 13:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Date headings edit

Hi, I don't think it is in keeping with other wiki pages to put dates in the sections, it looks unprofessional. The text itself should make clear to the reader the historical point in question.Noodleki (talk) 21:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. All removed. ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones The Welsh Buzzard ‑ ‑ 17:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of watches. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply