Talk:History of the British Raj

Image copyright problem with Image:Mountbatten 4 august 1947.jpg

The image Image:Mountbatten 4 august 1947.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Name and scope

Following from the discussion about the name of the British Raj page, I find this page out of kilter even with that. It seems to take a different meaning for "British Raj" from everyone else's... surely this article, if it keeps this name, shouldn't be dealing with 18th century India or the events of 1857? Umar Zulfikar Khan (talk) 12:15, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

This page name is wrong as it starts from the 17th century until 1947, and should be renamed. History of British India or maybe history of Colonial India and bring in branches of the French & Portuguese Empie sections to this page.--Rockybiggs (talk) 14:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, the first two sections "Company rule" and "Rebellion" need to be reduced to a one-paragraph introductory section. The page was created in order to reduce the size of the history section in British raj. There, some users had insisted on adding a company rule and rebellion section. (This, I think, was about a year ago.) It was around the time I was expanding that article, and soon, as the size began to get unwieldy, I hit upon the idea of having a parent article (this one). Unfortunately, I never got around pruning either article! If either of you would like to reduce those two sections to one introductory paragraph, please go ahead. It would be a great help. We could then do the same for British Raj's history sections. Thanks. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, I have made an attempt at this task. It really was surprisingly difficult. I am sure that others will be able to improve on my efforts. Umar Zulfikar Khan (talk) 07:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Nehru quotation

I've left this quotation about poverty exactly as it was, but following the steps suggested by Fowler&fowler above has made it very prominent, and to me it looks quite "political" for a work like this. However, I don't remember seeing it on another Wikipedia page and I didn't feel it was for me to delete it on my own. What do other people think? Umar Zulfikar Khan (talk) 08:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Incomplete

Where are Gandhiji led non-violent movements?Ovsek (talk) 15:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the British Raj. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110505163318/http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1920/1920.pdf to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1920/1920.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761557562_13/India.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Duff short citations

I have tagged a number of duff short citations, where no work is listed to match the reference. DuncanHill (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Social science

Paragraph 2409:4043:619:EA88:221B:737A:D650:6ECD (talk) 02:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

lawde

lavde lavde 2401:4900:3EEB:7192:0:15:C7D2:E401 (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

I need it from the Mughal time

Vsndnndndn fshvd ejhehee ehehe tegeg enbehe eyhhe hacked Hacked Gshdbbdhdyehbevhdy hehe Vdndjhfnfnjf 39.34.133.198 (talk) 08:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)