Talk:History of Lithuania (book)

English

Is this book going to be published in English? I would love to have it in my library Tymek 00:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

As would I... —Nightstallion 15:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

This book is certain to tell me much more about Lithuania than I really want to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.9.52.174 (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

More info

Could you include the number of illustrations, maps, and figures in the volumes published thus far? Novickas 16:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Review

Firstly good work. I always enjoy reading a new article, especially one that someone has improved to a good quality. Here are just a few thoughts as you requested on my talk page:

• After its completion it will be the largest academic publication covering Lithuania’s history ever released and will include the latest research findings. This needs a reference/source after the sentance to support the statement.
• Do we need to know every editor on the editorial board? Perhaps just write more than twenty scholars are working on the project with wikilinks to the two scholars who have a wikipedia entry. This is just my opinion - you should ask other editors though.
• Please expand and reference this: The Lithuanian Institute of History is acting in cooperation with Lithuanian universities, including Vilnius University, increasing scholarly involvement in the project. - perhaps you could tell us how they are working together? Are they meeting for lectures, having seminars etc? Can you tell us what impact this might have on the future books?
• Please reference the following: An in-depth analysis was made of the evolution of the Baltic tribes in the region, since these Lithuanians were the only Balts to create their own state. Also is Balts the correct way to describe them or is it an abbrievation? If so perhaps this would be better - since these Lithuanians were the only people in the Baltic region to create their own state. ?
• Finally and I think this important for an academic work - could you add a reception/criticism/what other academians think of this? Surely one or both of the books released may have been reviewed by newspapers and academic journals? Perhaps there is a media source or scholar that disagrees with a statement in the books? I think this is important to get the article to GA and beyond.

If you have any questions, please ask. Thanks and good work again. LordHarris 10:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Just from quickly flipping through it, I have a very hard time picturing a citizen attempting to read this book. Once it is complete, an effort should be made to condense it into one or two volumes with special emphasis on editing to make it readable and painless for an educated non-historian. I'm sure it's of great use to some people, e.g. history students, or to refer to it with a specific question, but I refuse to have it on my bookshelf. Vincas1 (talk) 06:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Lithuania (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070113180115/http://www.istorija.lt/html/ldk1.html to http://www.istorija.lt/html/ldk1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071111125306/http://www.istorija.lt/html/lietuvos-1-2005_ivadas.html to http://www.istorija.lt/html/lietuvos-1-2005_ivadas.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)