Talk:History of Cologne

In 455, the Salian Franks finally captured

Well, this is a start class. Needs lots of work. None of the main generalizations are referenced. As an example, we have this statement about the Salian Franks. I don't know why they would want to capture it as Clovis was a Salian king (as well as a Merovingian) and according to Gregory of Tours the city enthusiastically put itself under his kingship in 496, lifting him up on their shields. But then the whole topic of the early Franks is still pretty much in deficit. If you start in one one thing you soon find yourself on others. Fine, someone started the article and others like it. Let's get on with it. Almost nothing in here is sacrosanct and about the last thing I would do is translate from the German article.Dave (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

45,000 people?

The Roman city had, according to Russell, 96.8 hectares. Russell estimates 150 people/hectare for Lugdunum, 200/hectare for Capua, and dividing his estimate of the population by his estimate of the urbanized area, 250/hectare for Roma. Admittedly, there was a lot of variation from apartment blocks to open space in this last city, but the estimate of 45,000 people [in the article, sine references] implies a density far in excess of even Roma. 173.66.211.53 (talk) 02:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Free Imperial City of Cologne

I've suggested that Free Imperial City of Cologne be merged with Cologne, but another editor has suggested it should be merged with this article at Talk:Cologne. Dougweller (talk) 11:55, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Timeline of Cologne

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 14:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Cologne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130705032134/http://www.museenkoeln.de/ns-dok/ to http://www.museenkoeln.de/ns-dok/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)