This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I admit this is an odd criticism to level against any article in Wikipedia, but IMHO it is too long. Perhaps I think that because it needs to be more tightly organized. The lead goes into far more detail than needed. Some sections -- such as the archeological account of Roman Carmona -- are perhaps better split off into their own articles, & a summary left behind. On the other hand, this article appears to be quite thorough & packed with lots of information. Nevertheless, with some editorial work, it could become a Featured Article. -- llywrch (talk) 19:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
As the editor who wrote the article, I appreciate your input. I am aware that the lede is exceptionally long, but I really don't see how one can summarize the more than 2200-year history of a place in four short paragraphs, the suggested length, I believe. It's also true that some of the information could be spun off into separate articles, but I would hate to see that happen. This article, which would be the main article for the subject, gets an average of maybe five views per day—any subsidiary articles would surely get fewer.
May I say that the featured article process, and the barebones streamlining that often results, can be dispiriting for content creators like me, who find their own process come to nought. Someone can decide to bring an article to "featured" status, and get a gold star, so to speak, for their often minimal work, compared to my labors of translating the article from Spanish WP that this one is based on, plus finding sources and images, plus the effort of creating new sourced content. That happened with another article that I did almost all the work on, and it was a disturbing to see someone else get the "glory" (not in my book;-) for taking my work to "good" status.
It seems to me that the whole ethos of some editors who do that is a bit predatory and the process of elevating articles that way is itself rather cheesy. Carlstak (talk) 02:06, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
