Talk:History of Canadian nationality law

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Chocoholic2017 in topic 1953 and 1967 amendments

I removed the reference to 'Canada recognises dual citizenship' - there is no policy that explicitly 'recognises' dual citizenship, Canadian law simply doesn't restrict it.

I think this article is of extremely high quality, is well balanced and factually accurate. I think it should be nominated as a 'feature article.'

File:First official Canadian Citizenship ceremony at the Supreme Court building.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:First official Canadian Citizenship ceremony at the Supreme Court building.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC

A Canadian Citizen is a British Subject? edit

This article seems misleading, as I recall those words remained on passports until 1977, and according to this source, 1946 did not sever the connection between Canadian and British citizenships as closely as this article seems to imply. http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/citizenship/

1953 and 1967 amendments edit

I really think that there should be sources for the information on these two amendments. I'm not saying that the information is necessarily wrong, it's just that for now I would like to be able to check it for myself. Thanks to anyone who can provide links to this. Chocoholic2017 (talk) 19:07, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply