Talk:Hiroshi Inoue (bryologist)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by EpicPupper in topic Requested move 8 February 2022

Death date edit

This article says he died in 1989. But what about stuff like this? Maybe the father was a botanist, and the son is an entomologist.Anythingyouwant (talk) 02:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 8 February 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hiroshi InoueHiroshi Inoue (bryologist) – I think that between Hiroshi Inoue the bryologist and Hiroshi Inoue (entomologist) there is no primary topic, so the page Hiroshi Inoue should instead become a disambiguation page. There seem to be 6 incoming article-space Wikilinks for the bryologist and around 190 Wikilinks for the entomologist at present. Both articles have low traffic, averaging less than 5 pageviews per day: [1]. species:Hiroshi Inoue (bryo.) and species:Hiroshi Inoue (ent.) also have comparable view counts within Wikispecies (around 5 for the past thirty days). Googling for "Hiroshi Inoue" brings up assorted people with that name as opposed to primarily results from/by one of these two biologists. The disambiguator (bryologist) appears in articles like Robert Braithwaite (bryologist), Karl Müller (bryologist), and Hiroshi Inoue (bryologist) already exists as a redirect, but we could also move this article to Hiroshi Inoue (botanist). Wikispecies has an entry for a third Hiroshi Inoue, the phycologist species:Hiroshi Inoue (phyc.) which might be a factor, but he doesn't seem to be notable for Wikipedia. Umimmak (talk) 03:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. The entomologist seems at least as important. I'm unsure as to the best qualifier; (botanist) is normal but (bryologist) has existing links and distinguishes from the phycologist. Not a WP:ONEOTHER because there's no primary topic. Certes (talk) 11:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.