Talk:Hillary Leone
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Vexations in topic Failed Verification on Harvard School of Design website
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Adding Footnotes edit
I will be adding more footnotes shortly Robrobrob2 (talk) 05:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Failed Verification on Harvard School of Design website edit
Vexations, at the link provided it says that the site is designed by Cabengo, Hillary Leone's company. I am undoing this failed verification marker. Robrobrob2 (talk) 02:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Robrobrob2, Do you mean http://www.archimuse.com/mw2003/best/win_innovative.html, where you removed the failed verification tag in this diff https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hillary_Leone&type=revision&diff=976078767&oldid=976078544&diffmode=source? I don't see it any mention of either Cabengo or Leone. Vexations (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- Vexations, sorry for the miscommunication, I meant https://web.archive.org/web/20081231025616/http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/. I have since updated the other one you mentioned. I found the mention of Cabengo.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Robrobrob2 (talk • contribs)
- Robrobrob2 It's a bit odd to say it's a "notable" redesign if no secondary sources exist that discuss that design, don't you think? Did you think it is notable -because- it's Harvard's GSD? I don't think so. Vexations (talk) 21:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- I agree Vexations. I have updated it. Let me know what you think. Robrobrob2 (talk) 5:07, 12 September 2020
- Robrobrob2 I think there are well over 250,000 web designers in the US alone, and a large number of them have worked on the website of more-or-less notable organizations of which there are tens, if not hundreds of thousands. Very few of those websites are so good, innovative or otherwise remarkable that they are written about in independent, reliable sources. Those, we would consider notable. The others are unremarkable (and we know this because nobody wrote about them). Inclusion of such projects in an encyclopedia is undue. Vexations (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- I agree Vexations. I have updated it. Let me know what you think. Robrobrob2 (talk) 5:07, 12 September 2020
- Robrobrob2 It's a bit odd to say it's a "notable" redesign if no secondary sources exist that discuss that design, don't you think? Did you think it is notable -because- it's Harvard's GSD? I don't think so. Vexations (talk) 21:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Vexations, sorry for the miscommunication, I meant https://web.archive.org/web/20081231025616/http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/. I have since updated the other one you mentioned. I found the mention of Cabengo.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Robrobrob2 (talk • contribs)