Talk:Hergé/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As explained at Talk:Hergé#Not_up_to_modern_Good_Article_standards, this article is not up to modern GA standards. Numerous citation needed templates, unaddressed for weeks, are a quick fail criteria. If no significant improvements are carried out within a week, I will delist this article, sadly. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Bravo, Brigade Piron, for efforts to improve the article back to GA standards! Please let me know if I can help by answering specific questions requiring source material about Hergé. Prhartcom (talk) 16:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Prhartcom! Unfortunately I don't have the "big books" on the topic (or at least, not to hand) so am confined to using free ones for the moment which restricts what I can add. Could you see if Thompson et al. can add anything on the WWII paragraph, in particular? Brigade Piron (talk) 16:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

All right; looks like I'm in for it now! Yes indeed; I'll begin this weekend. Prhartcom (talk) 04:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Brigade Piron, I'm sorry; I did not have the time this weekend to look at this. Prhartcom (talk) 18:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Prhartcom, we're nearly done - any chance of filling in the ten-or-so remaining tags? Brigade Piron (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes indeed; I know I can be of help. I have a big deadline a week from today in the real world. You have probably waited for slow editors before; sorry to ask, but would it be possible for you to wait one week for me? Never mind, real life can wait, Let me look at it now. To be continued. Prhartcom (talk) 21:32, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

I apologise for not taking care of this. I haven't forgotten; I just have not been able to do as much Wikipedia work as I would like. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 20:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

I think this article has improved significantly over the past few weeks. Can we take care of the few remaining cite needed templates by the end of this month? I don't mind keeping this review open, but somebody who's more a stickler for the rules can come over and argue that such reviews should technically last for about a week... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:40, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Since the article now seems to have been virtually re-written - and is virtually 6 months old! - can this nom be finally got rid of? —Brigade Piron (talk) 09:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

..? —Brigade Piron (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

I am fine with this article remaining a GA and closing this reassessment, through I did add some cite needed tags to the Hergé#Legacy section - it is the only part of the article that remains underreferenced. Once this is fixed, I'd suggest an A-class or FA-class review. Nice work! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

So... can you close the review then? ;) —Brigade Piron (talk) 00:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

If there is a procedure for this, go ahead, I am not sure how to close it and right now I am pressed for time and cannot figure out the right wiki-solution. Hopefully some template removal or parameter change will do. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:14, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

There are several citation tags still in the article. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

There are no citation needed tags in the article now. As this reassessment has been open for so long, I have closed this. If there are issues with the article, feel free to open a new GA reassessment. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 07:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)