Talk:Heraclius/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Initial comments

edit

I've done a quick couple of read-throughs and have seen the "copyedit" flag. At this point in the time, not withstanding that flag, the article appears to have a reasonable likelihood of becoming a GA by the end of the review. I will now do a more detailed review; and will try and fix any copy editing problems that I encounter. This might take a day of so, but the review should be finished before the end of the weekend. Pyrotec (talk) 21:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

I'm awarding this GA-status. Congraultations on your efforts. Pyrotec (talk) 09:49, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply