Talk:Henry Wickham (explorer)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

NPOV edit

[1] says that "The evildoer was an English botanist named Alexander Wickham. Tradition has it that this British gent smuggled some 70,000 seeds of hevea brasiliensis out of the country saying they were for Queen Victoria's Kew Gardens in England, and soon plantations in the British colonies in South-East Asia where producing rubber more cheaply than Brazil."

Which is correct?--203.45.119.219 04:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

The area Sir Henry Wickman collect the seeds, was near Vila Boim at the left bank of Tapajós River, few miles from the city of Santarém in Satate of Pará, not Manaus area
That someone can be a 'biopirate' when there is no law against it is a contradiction in terms. The expression is an empty bit of rhetoric. Brazil is a great country that consumes maize and chocolate amongst other things. The seeds for those originated in Mexico. Does that make Brazilians 'biopirates'? Of course not. 109.157.23.220 (talk) 19:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Talking of the Rule of Law in most of 19th Century Latin America is an anachronism: the place was a wild west. However, that does not mean that there was no policy, if only that of the rubber bosses who had banned the export of rubber trees, seedlings and seeds to preserve their effective monopoly, which had become expensive after Goodyear's discovery of vulcanisation in the early 1840s. This led the British Government to break the monopoly as described: that all parties agree means that this article is at best contentious, which becomes a breach of NPOV when one considers the use of non-neutral terminology such as "pirate" and "self-aggrandising", and the general rhetorical tone. The case must either be proven or separated from historical fact into a distinct section. As I know insufficient of the authorities to present a balanced point of view, I am unwilling to do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.129.138.254 (talk) 06:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Wickham (explorer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply