This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Huh Hieroglyph Egyptian phonetic glyph ancestor of Infinity symboledit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Written in Egyptian phonetic glyphs, Huh is a pair of the 'h' glyph U(1339B) - rope twists - which resemble the modern infinity symbol turned vertically. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.189.9.57 (talk) 10:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Heiroglyph for "Huh" is a guy with both arms raised and shoulders shrugged. Heh heh heh. SamuelRiv (talk) 02:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Well, actually the article title should be Heh (heh heh heh). Practically all the sources spell it that way. I suppose I should move the article to that title soon. But yes, the coincidence is mildly amusing. A. Parrot (talk) 03:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Anybody got some more image sources of depictions of the god? It would really spruce the page up a bit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucasgrange (talk • contribs) 20:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The assertion that Heh is "the personification of infinity or eternity" isn't sourced. That he might be "eternity" is easy to understand; "infinity" is a rather more abstract concept and claiming them as alternates isn't obviously justified William M. Connolley (talk) 09:46, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
I've added sources and changed text to address this question. Egyptologists don't seem to doubt that the ancient Egyptians had a concept of infinity. A. Parrot (talk) 17:50, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I’ve restored a series of variant transliterations of Heh’s name which were recently deleted citing a possible hoax. I have been in conversation with a friend of the perpetrator of said “hoax” on social media tonight (they were publicizing that their friend couldn’t believe they’d gotten away with adding fake names to an already-humorous Wikipedia article), and determined that the only name variant that was facetiously added by this person was “Hahuh”—which makes sense, as it’s the only variant that adds a consonant to the transliteration, which would to my understanding require a different hieroglyphic rendering. Herearesome screenshots the friend provided me of IRC logs including the hoaxer, discussing this article and the vandalism done—to my reading, these logs suggest they were only responsible for “Hahuh”. YarLucebith (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply