Talk:Heartbeat (series 1–10)
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Missing Special edit
Right at the end of Series 7, after #24, is Nick and his wife starting in Canada, a long length special feature "Changing Places" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtL3UQ5ptl0 - This should be inserted in the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.211.93.46 (talk) 00:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Query edit
I do not understand why we have this list as we already have articles Heartbeat (series 1–5) and Heartbeat (series 6–10). Is it an attempt to combine or what? Keith D (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Article series set-up edit
I have started a discussion on the set-up of the series articles for this programme at here. Please air your thoughts. Keith D (talk) 14:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Sources? edit
May I ask what is source for this information, i.e. episodes' summaries? I could find no citations or references. Original research? Some of this is original indeed; bears little resemblance to episode in question. E.g.:
As he investigates a number of post office robberies, Nick's narrow-minded attitude towards an old enemy puts her in danger when her ex-cellmate escapes from prison and resorts to drastic lengths with her villainous boyfriend to corrupt the reformed criminal. (S 6.14 The Best Laid Plans)
Well, there seems to be just missing line, between 'Nick's' and 'narrow' but from where is it taken? And this lady who put smth in her (violent) husband's whisky was hardly a hardened criminal in first place, so reformed criminal is bit too much to say. Or
Nick comes to an unstable women's rescue when she drunkenly burns down her house after splitting up with her boyfriend.(S.6.13 Obsessions)
She most definitely did not burn down her house; she set fire to her carpet, only part of one room in her cottage was burned. Rest was slightly damaged by smoke smell. Those are just examples, from freshly watching the show. But it's no good to correct summaries based only on watching the show, it'd be original research, or what? :) If it's OK to use IMDB as source, there are bit better summaries...And possibility to correct them. BirgittaMTh (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)