Talk:He That Believeth in Me/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by MPJ-DK in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I've never reviewed a TV episode before but I've checked out a long line of other episode GA articles and the MOS and all so let's get to it.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- There is one whole section unsourced - "Plot", it's usually got at least 1 citation in what I've seen.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Looks in order to me
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- I see activity connected with GA preparations and that's it
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
It's one tiny thing and then I'll approve it, good work. MPJ-DK (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I'm just confused about the "tiny" thing that needs to be done. Correct me if I'm wrong, but you want me to find a source for the plot. I'll see this page soon, as I am going to college today and may not be back until tonight. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 10:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- No need for confusion, you got it right, a source for the plot section would really be good. No rush the traditional hold period is up to a week so don't worry. MPJ-DK (talk) 11:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- OK, it's just that I thought plots don't need citations. However, I think I know where to find a reliable source. I'll have it done within the next few minutes (depending on how fast the internet at home is going). -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Completed. I trust this will do :) -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 17:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- No need for confusion, you got it right, a source for the plot section would really be good. No rush the traditional hold period is up to a week so don't worry. MPJ-DK (talk) 11:48, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
I just saw a few GAs have a source on that section, figured it was a good idea. I'm giving it the GA status now. Well done, really excellent job.MPJ-DK (talk) 01:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)