Talk:Harvard Graphics

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Not the first edit

I have information that Harvard Graphics was not the first commercial presentation graphics program. How do I go about editing this? Should I create an entry for the first presentation graphics program, with citations (journal articles, copy rights etc...), then edit the Harvard Graphics page to indicate they were not the first (probably the second)?

I am new to Wikipedia and could use some guidance and assistance.

Thank you,

Jeremykrey

It's a bit late for a reply I guess seeing you posted almost a yesr ago! Personally the best advice I can give you is to get stuck in, click Edit and make changes as you see fit. Start with minor changes and work up from that. It's how I started. It does seem however that someone else has already modified the article to mention similar what you say, maybe it could do with adding your citations? AWoodland 11:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harvard Graphics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply