Talk:Hare–Clark electoral system
Latest comment: 5 months ago by 68.150.205.46 in topic Tasmania and ACT uses Gregory method but uses only last parcel received
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Quota Determination edit
Under 2. Determining the quota, is this describing a Droop quota, a Hare quota, or some other system? If the last, what is that system called?
1.126.108.98 (talk) 22:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Animation explaining the distribution of preferences edit
I'd suggest that a great addition to this page would be an animation similar to this one illustrating the 2016 Murrumbidgee count (by Markus Mannheim, originally embedded in this ABC News article), so that people can imagine how the quotas / vote exhaustion works. Is this something that is possible in Wikipedia? Data geeks? Stuart mcmillen (talk) 03:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Tasmania and ACT uses Gregory method but uses only last parcel received edit
description of the Hare-Clark does not mention that only the last parcel is examined to determine transfers. 68.150.205.46 (talk) 03:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)