Current Uhlig controversy edit

I know of the current calls for him to resign on twitter. Is there a need to include the reference to his past new york times letter or blogpost? At least I don't think it is appropriate in the career section, since it doesn't concern his work as a macroeconomist. I think it is more appropriate to wait for the episode to play out, and if he does actually resign, add a controversy section to the article. --Ysjzysn (talk) 14:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I think two things about this: there may now be enough sources to handle this event properly, and as it is written right now it is not handled properly. I took a few tries yesterday introducing sections and organisation to this page that made sense, and I still don't think I succeeded, so I definitely encourage you to shift things around if you see a better way. I'll go reword things at least a little bit now. - Astrophobe (talk) 18:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply