This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject TikTok, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of TikTok on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TikTokWikipedia:WikiProject TikTokTemplate:WikiProject TikTokTikTok articles
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Pearl Davis was copied or moved into Hannah Pearl Davis with this edit on 24 October 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Latest comment: 6 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Wikipedia articles should always be written from a neutral point-of-view.
Articles are improved with facts that can be verified, not rumors or opinions.
This article states, “She gained widespread attention in 2023 for her misogynistic commentary.”
Stating that she is ‘misogynistic’ is an opinion and shouldn’t be in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.184.68.90 (talk) 05:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The other IP's removal of this statement was correct as per WP:GRAPEVINE. Sourcing will have to be better than the Evening Standard since it has no consensus for reliability. SmolBrane (talk) 18:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Forgot to mention--the material used to be cited to say her opinions were 'controversial', maybe this would be acceptable but it doesn't really tell the reader much. SmolBrane (talk) 19:00, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
She did write in a tweet "16 year old chicks are hotter than 26 year olds". People saw it as "advocating for dating underage women" but she said it was meant to say "most people are better looking when they're younger" because "by numbers alone most people are overweight or obese by 26".[1] She deleted the tweet later. Her views on looks or how she expresses it is debatable but does not seem to be defending hebephilia. 212.96.35.197 (talk) 10:06, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
