 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Just a few points as Scienter put this article up for peer review.
- More links or more accuracy can be added. (Consideration is better as 'consideration under american law|consideration'). More blue...
- The 'influence of the case' could be extended to judicial effects. High-profile or important cases that follow this case or affirmation in a higher court.
- You could add an also see section. for Contract or even add the ContractLaw box
- The article doesn't mention any preliminary courts. The way it reads is that the case went straight to the court of appeals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.166.47.201 (talk) 06:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
The facts and law is good :-) The Law project seems especially reluctant to assess - in FA, A and GA there are only 8 articles ALTOGETHER !! Bamkin 15:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)