Talk:Halostachys

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that a range map be included in this article to improve its quality.

Species name needs more investigation

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Plant List and Flora of China differ as to whether the correct name of the species is H. caspica or H. belangeriana. That needs further investigation. The validation of Halostachys caspica C. A. Meyer ex Schrenk in Bulletin de la Class Physico-Mathematique de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg. St. Petersburg, sér. 2. 1: 361. 1843, as listed by Flora of China seems to be the important document, but I don't have access to it. In the meantime, I've taken a guess that Flora of China is correct and The Plant List is simply unaware of that document. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Halostachys belangerianum (based on Arthrocnemum belangerianum Moq., 1840) is correct. Halostachys caspica (Pall.) C.A.Mey. ex Schrenk is validly published in 1843 and based on a nom. illeg. Further info on wikispecies --Thiotrix (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic